What does 'preponderance of the evidence' imply in guardianship hearings?

In guardianship hearings, 'preponderance of the evidence' signifies that one party's evidence is more convincing and likely true than the opposing party's. This standard does not require the evidence to be overwhelmingly strong; rather, it indicates that the evidence presented tips the scales slightly in favor of one side. This means that if there is a greater than 50% chance that the claims being made are true based on the evidence presented, then the decision should lean towards that conclusion.

This standard is particularly relevant in guardianship cases where the implications for an individual's autonomy and well-being are significant. The goal is to ensure that decisions made reflect what is most likely in the best interest of the person for whom guardianship is being considered, based on the evidence available. In contrast to the other options, the preponderance of the evidence does not necessitate overwhelming proof, does not equate to just a suggestion, and does not require that all evidence be uncontested to reach a conclusion.